|
|
How Amber Guilds Operated in Cities of the Baltic Coast Antoni Romuald Chodynski
The Gdańsk Amber Guild vs. Bunglers
It is also worth noting that master Christoph Maucher, builder of the world-famous grand Malbork coffer, who was not a member of the guild, was considered a ‘bungler’ and as a craftsman working for the royal court was not a member of the guild. The guild authorities would raid the bunglers and take over their workshops. It was not so much about their admittedly modest equipment: a table with a fixed manual lathe, a set of sharp knives, gimlets and files, but rather about the raw amber and the harassment. Gdansk native Georg Schröder handed down a description of an amber workshop he visited in the mid-17th century. The conditions for apprenticeship and the making of a masterpiece (Meisterstück)
A candidate for apprenticeship presented his family credentials and baptism document, while a candidate for journeyman would present references from his master on his years of apprenticeship and impeccable behaviour. Apprenticeship in the Elblag guild (1539) would take four years. In the Gdansk amber guild, the training period (in the 15th century) would amount to a year-and-a-half, while in the early 16th century – to three years. It was best if these years were uninterrupted by journey, were spent at a single workshop and without incident. In the Gdansk guild (in 1616) a candidate was eligible for a journeyman’s examination upon reaching the age of 25. The candidate was obliged to notify his employer and the guild elders about his intention to be received as a master, by announcing (Heischumg) his decision at the quarterly guild meeting. In the Elblag guild he could make such an announcement only after four years of service. The exam was a skill test, so according to the earliest Gdansk statute (1477), a journeyman would have to work a pound of amber he bought himself. He would also have to pay the guild’s elders, who supervised the work, 2 marks of silver (1522). Next he was to treat the elders to a barrel of beer (in the Elblag guild, it was a barrel of beer and ham). According to Elblag’s “old guild roll” dated 1539, a master was not allowed to have more than two apprentices. According to the “new roll” of 1699, he was allowed to employ up to three journeymen at the same time. Some masters from the Slupsk guild would accept up to five apprentices per year (1571, 1603) in the 1596-1616 period, and so for 20 years 20 boys would be employed at Jacob Schmidt’s, one of the Slupsk masters, each of whom would serve a four-year apprenticeship. The Engelbrecht family (Caspar, Tiburius, Thomas and Jacob) was the most famous. Caspar, an elder in the guild, accepted his last apprentice in 1584. Thomas and Jacob are mentioned only once in a while, while Tiburius, who ran his workshop for 40 years (1569 – 1609), accepted some 20 apprentices over this period, each for an apprenticeship of four years. More than 125 boys in all served as apprentices in 25 workshops in the 1569-1621 period. Some Slupsk masters, like Caspar Engelbrecht, would accept as many as five apprentices per year (1571); Jacob Schmidt also took in five boys (1603). Selected affairs from the life of the guildGuild directives strictly regulated the work time and free time for both apprentices and journeymen of the amber craft (and other crafts as well). They ordered them to lead a righteous life, be loyal to their employer and display moral and religious conduct away from the workshop; they also set the times for the beginning and end of work, mandatory participation in the funerals of guild members and their families, and established penalties for offences and serious misdemeanours. They detail separately the rights and obligations for elder and younger masters. According to the revised regulations from the 16th century, a young master of the Elblag amber guild was obliged to do military service in defence of the city. To this end, he was to allot 3 marks for the purchase of a cuirass (Harnisch) and harquebus, as well as 2 marks for naval equipment, and was obliged to donate 6 pounds of wax to the masters’ common counter. The masters of the Slupsk amber guild were among the more affluent, the so-called merchants who had control over the trade in amber products and ... beer brewing. The right to brew and sell beer on equal footing with the brewers of Slupsk was a privilege given to them by West-Pomeranian Duke Barnim XI in 1534. The extra income helped the amber craftsmen survive in the hardest years when raw amber supplies from the Sambian deposits in Ducal Prussia were withheld. In the 1730s, three ranks of affluence emerged in Slupsk. The highest rank was occupied by five to seven master merchants, who were de-facto monopolists. In the 1740s some 40-45 workshops were dependent on these wholesalers. Two groups emerged from these workshops; the first comprised some 20-25 semi-independent amber craftsmen, who were still able purchase the raw material allotted to them by the guild. However, they had to sell their products to the merchants. The rest, who supported some 20 families, became labourers, and their living standards were no different than beggars’. These families suffered the most acute poverty during the Great Northern War of 1700-1721 (when Prussia obtained the status of kingdom). Competition between the guilds for barrels with amber and the range of raw amber prospecting
The amber gatherers’ work was also subject to codification. By this term I refer to the amber miners and sea amber fishers – as opposed to the amber craftsmen, or the masters and manufacturers who run the workshops, as well as the journeymen who made amber products. The first decrees for these labourers date back to the 16th century. They specify the nature of the work, the prospecting area, the use of boats and their shape, the use of tools such as landing nets, regular nets, boathooks etc. These regulations were amended in 1725, while those for amber gatherers in Gdansk had their amendment in the 19th century. There were also separately compiled instructions for the inspectors (Kammerknechter) who patrolled the shore and monitored the fishing and gathering of amber on the sea coasts (1783). * Since Gdansk was in Royal Prussia, part of the Kingdom of Poland, it was not under the Prussian king’s jurisdiction [translator’s note].
back to page: amber history |